Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1
From: Luis Vitorio Cargnini (lvcargnini_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-06 10:18:08


$0,02 of contribution, try macports

Le 09-05-04 à 11:42, Jeff Squyres a écrit :

> FWIW, I don't use Xcode, but I use the precompiled gcc/gfortran from
> here with good success:
>
> http://hpc.sourceforge.net/
>
>
>
> On May 4, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Warner Yuen wrote:
>
>> Have you installed a Fortran compiler? Mac OS X's developer tools do
>> not come with a Fortran compiler, so you'll need to install one if
>> you
>> haven't already done so. I routinely use the Intel IFORT compilers
>> with success. However, I hear many good things about the gfortran
>> compilers on Mac OS X, you can't beat the price of gfortran!
>>
>>
>> Warner Yuen
>> Scientific Computing
>> Consulting Engineer
>> Apple, Inc.
>> email: wyuen_at_[hidden]
>> Tel: 408.718.2859
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 4, 2009, at 7:28 AM, users-request_at_[hidden] wrote:
>>
>> > Send users mailing list submissions to
>> > users_at_[hidden]
>> >
>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> > users-request_at_[hidden]
>> >
>> > You can reach the person managing the list at
>> > users-owner_at_[hidden]
>> >
>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
>> >
>> >
>> > Today's Topics:
>> >
>> > 1. How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1 (Vicente)
>> > 2. Re: 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ?? (Ralph Castain)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 1
>> > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:12:44 +0200
>> > From: Vicente <vpuibor_at_[hidden]>
>> > Subject: [OMPI users] How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1
>> > To: users_at_[hidden]
>> > Message-ID: <1C2C0085-940F-43BB-910F-975871AE2F09_at_[hidden]>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed";
>> > DelSp="yes"
>> >
>> > Hi, I've seen the FAQ "How do I use Open MPI wrapper compilers in
>> > Xcode", but it's only for MPICC. I am using MPIF90, so I did the
>> same,
>> > but changing MPICC for MPIF90, and also the path, but it did not
>> work.
>> >
>> > Building target ?fortran? of project ?fortran? with configuration
>> > ?Debug?
>> >
>> >
>> > Checking Dependencies
>> > Invalid value 'MPIF90' for GCC_VERSION
>> >
>> >
>> > The file "MPIF90.cpcompspec" looks like this:
>> >
>> > 1 /**
>> > 2 Xcode Coompiler Specification for MPIF90
>> > 3
>> > 4 */
>> > 5
>> > 6 { Type = Compiler;
>> > 7 Identifier = com.apple.compilers.mpif90;
>> > 8 BasedOn = com.apple.compilers.gcc.4_0;
>> > 9 Name = "MPIF90";
>> > 10 Version = "Default";
>> > 11 Description = "MPI GNU C/C++ Compiler 4.0";
>> > 12 ExecPath = "/usr/local/bin/mpif90"; // This gets
>> > converted to the g++ variant automatically
>> > 13 PrecompStyle = pch;
>> > 14 }
>> >
>> > and is located in "/Developer/Library/Xcode/Plug-ins"
>> >
>> > and when I do mpif90 -v on terminal it works well:
>> >
>> > Using built-in specs.
>> > Target: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
>> > Configured with: /tmp/gfortran-20090321/ibin/../gcc/configure --
>> > prefix=/usr/local/gfortran --enable-languages=c,fortran --with-
>> gmp=/
>> > tmp/gfortran-20090321/gfortran_libs --enable-bootstrap
>> > Thread model: posix
>> > gcc version 4.4.0 20090321 (experimental) [trunk revision 144983]
>> > (GCC)
>> >
>> >
>> > Any idea??
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Vincent
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 2
>> > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 08:28:26 -0600
>> > From: Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]>
>> > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>> > To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]>
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <71d2d8cc0905040728h2002f4d7s4c49219eee29e86f_at_[hidden]>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, I didn't write any of that code - I was just
>> fixing the
>> > mapper so it would properly map the procs. From what I can tell,
>> the
>> > proper
>> > things are happening there.
>> >
>> > I'll have to dig into the code that specifically deals with parsing
>> > the
>> > results to bind the processes. Afraid that will take awhile
>> longer -
>> > pretty
>> > dark in that hole.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Geoffroy Pignot
>> > <geopignot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> So, there are no more crashes with my "crazy" mpirun command.
>> But the
>> >> paffinity feature seems to be broken. Indeed I am not able to
>> pin my
>> >> processes.
>> >>
>> >> Simple test with a program using your plpa library :
>> >>
>> >> r011n006% cat hostf
>> >> r011n006 slots=4
>> >>
>> >> r011n006% cat rankf
>> >> rank 0=r011n006 slot=0 ----> bind to CPU 0 , exact ?
>> >>
>> >> r011n006% /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.4a/bin/mpirun --hostfile hostf --
>> >> rankfile
>> >> rankf --wdir /tmp -n 1 a.out
>> >>>>> PLPA Number of processors online: 4
>> >>>>> PLPA Number of processor sockets: 2
>> >>>>> PLPA Socket 0 (ID 0): 2 cores
>> >>>>> PLPA Socket 1 (ID 3): 2 cores
>> >>
>> >> Ctrl+Z
>> >> r011n006%bg
>> >>
>> >> r011n006% ps axo stat,user,psr,pid,pcpu,comm | grep gpignot
>> >> R+ gpignot 3 9271 97.8 a.out
>> >>
>> >> In fact whatever the slot number I put in my rankfile , a.out
>> >> always runs
>> >> on the CPU 3. I was looking for it on CPU 0 accordind to my
>> cpuinfo
>> >> file
>> >> (see below)
>> >> The result is the same if I try another syntax (rank 0=r011n006
>> >> slot=0:0
>> >> bind to socket 0 - core 0 , exact ? )
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance
>> >>
>> >> Geoffroy
>> >>
>> >> PS: I run on rhel5
>> >>
>> >> r011n006% uname -a
>> >> Linux r011n006 2.6.18-92.1.1NOMAP32.el5 #1 SMP Sat Mar 15 01:46:39
>> >> CDT 2008
>> >> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> >>
>> >> My configure is :
>> >> ./configure --prefix=/tmp/openmpi-1.4a --libdir='${exec_prefix}/
>> >> lib64'
>> >> --disable-dlopen --disable-mpi-cxx --enable-heterogeneous
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> r011n006% cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> >> processor : 0
>> >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> >> cpu family : 6
>> >> model : 15
>> >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5150 @ 2.66GHz
>> >> stepping : 6
>> >> cpu MHz : 2660.007
>> >> cache size : 4096 KB
>> >> physical id : 0
>> >> siblings : 2
>> >> core id : 0
>> >> cpu cores : 2
>> >> fpu : yes
>> >> fpu_exception : yes
>> >> cpuid level : 10
>> >> wp : yes
>> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>> >> pge mca
>> >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>> >> nx lm
>> >> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>> >> bogomips : 5323.68
>> >> clflush size : 64
>> >> cache_alignment : 64
>> >> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>> >> power management:
>> >>
>> >> processor : 1
>> >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> >> cpu family : 6
>> >> model : 15
>> >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5150 @ 2.66GHz
>> >> stepping : 6
>> >> cpu MHz : 2660.007
>> >> cache size : 4096 KB
>> >> physical id : 3
>> >> siblings : 2
>> >> core id : 0
>> >> cpu cores : 2
>> >> fpu : yes
>> >> fpu_exception : yes
>> >> cpuid level : 10
>> >> wp : yes
>> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>> >> pge mca
>> >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>> >> nx lm
>> >> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>> >> bogomips : 5320.03
>> >> clflush size : 64
>> >> cache_alignment : 64
>> >> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>> >> power management:
>> >>
>> >> processor : 2
>> >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> >> cpu family : 6
>> >> model : 15
>> >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5150 @ 2.66GHz
>> >> stepping : 6
>> >> cpu MHz : 2660.007
>> >> cache size : 4096 KB
>> >> physical id : 0
>> >> siblings : 2
>> >> core id : 1
>> >> cpu cores : 2
>> >> fpu : yes
>> >> fpu_exception : yes
>> >> cpuid level : 10
>> >> wp : yes
>> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>> >> pge mca
>> >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>> >> nx lm
>> >> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>> >> bogomips : 5319.39
>> >> clflush size : 64
>> >> cache_alignment : 64
>> >> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>> >> power management:
>> >>
>> >> processor : 3
>> >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> >> cpu family : 6
>> >> model : 15
>> >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5150 @ 2.66GHz
>> >> stepping : 6
>> >> cpu MHz : 2660.007
>> >> cache size : 4096 KB
>> >> physical id : 3
>> >> siblings : 2
>> >> core id : 1
>> >> cpu cores : 2
>> >> fpu : yes
>> >> fpu_exception : yes
>> >> cpuid level : 10
>> >> wp : yes
>> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>> >> pge mca
>> >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>> >> nx lm
>> >> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>> >> bogomips : 5320.03
>> >> clflush size : 64
>> >> cache_alignment : 64
>> >> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>> >> power management:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> Message: 2
>> >>> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:45:57 -0600
>> >>> From: Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]>
>> >>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>> >>> To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]>
>> >>> Message-ID: <D01D7B16-4B47-46F3-AD41-D1A90B2E4927_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>
>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
>> >>> DelSp="yes"
>> >>>
>> >>> My apologies - I wasn't clear enough. You need a tarball from
>> r21111
>> >>> or greater...such as:
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/trunk/openmpi-1.4a1r21142.tar.gz
>> >>>
>> >>> HTH
>> >>> Ralph
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On May 4, 2009, at 2:14 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi ,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I got the openmpi-1.4a1r21095.tar.gz tarball, but
>> unfortunately my
>> >>>> command doesn't work
>> >>>>
>> >>>> cat rankf:
>> >>>> rank 0=node1 slot=*
>> >>>> rank 1=node2 slot=*
>> >>>>
>> >>>> cat hostf:
>> >>>> node1 slots=2
>> >>>> node2 slots=2
>> >>>>
>> >>>> mpirun --rankfile rankf --hostfile hostf --host node1 -n 1
>> >>>> hostname : --host node2 -n 1 hostname
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankf)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>> rmaps_rank_file.c at line 403
>> >>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>> base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 86
>> >>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>> base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 86
>> >>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>> plm_rsh_module.c at line 1016
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ralph, could you tell me if my command syntax is correct or
>> not ?
>> >>>> if
>> >>>> not, give me the expected one ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regards
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Geoffroy
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2009/4/30 Geoffroy Pignot <geopignot_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>> Immediately Sir !!! :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks again Ralph
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Geoffroy
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Message: 2
>> >>>> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:45:39 -0600
>> >>>> From: Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>> >>>> To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>> Message-ID:
>> >>>> <71d2d8cc0904300545v61a42fe1k50086d2704d0f7e6_at_[hidden]
>> >
>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I believe this is fixed now in our development trunk - you can
>> >>>> download any
>> >>>> tarball starting from last night and give it a try, if you like.
>> >>>> Any
>> >>>> feedback would be appreciated.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ralph
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ah now, I didn't say it -worked-, did I? :-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Clearly a bug exists in the program. I'll try to take a look
>> at it
>> >>>> (if Lenny
>> >>>> doesn't get to it first), but it won't be until later in the
>> week.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I agree with you Ralph , and that 's what I expect from openmpi
>> >>>> but my
>> >>>> second example shows that it's not working
>> >>>>
>> >>>> cat hostfile.0
>> >>>> r011n002 slots=4
>> >>>> r011n003 slots=4
>> >>>>
>> >>>> cat rankfile.0
>> >>>> rank 0=r011n002 slot=0
>> >>>> rank 1=r011n003 slot=1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -n 1
>> >>>> hostname
>> >>>> ### CRASHED
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankfile.0)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> rmaps_rank_file.c at line 404
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 87
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 77
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> plm_rsh_module.c at line 985
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1 while
>> >>>>> attempting to
>> >>>>>> launch so we are aborting.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>> >>>>> above).
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the
>> needed
>> >>>>> shared
>> >>>>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>> >>>>> have the
>> >>>>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this
>> >>>>>> will
>> >>>>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> orterun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to
>> the
>> >>>>> process
>> >>>>>> that caused that situation.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> orterun: clean termination accomplished
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Message: 4
>> >>>> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:55:58 -0600
>> >>>> From: Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>> >>>> To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>> Message-ID: <F6290ADA-A196-43F0-A853-CBCB802D8D9C_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
>> >>>> DelSp="yes"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The rankfile cuts across the entire job - it isn't applied on an
>> >>>> app_context basis. So the ranks in your rankfile must
>> correspond to
>> >>>> the eventual rank of each process in the cmd line.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Unfortunately, that means you have to count ranks. In your case,
>> >>>> you
>> >>>> only have four, so that makes life easier. Your rankfile would
>> look
>> >>>> something like this:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> rank 0=r001n001 slot=0
>> >>>> rank 1=r001n002 slot=1
>> >>>> rank 2=r001n001 slot=1
>> >>>> rank 3=r001n002 slot=2
>> >>>>
>> >>>> HTH
>> >>>> Ralph
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I agree that my examples are not very clear. What I want to do
>> >>>>> is to
>> >>>>> launch a multiexes application (masters-slaves) and benefit
>> from
>> >>>>> the
>> >>>>> processor affinity.
>> >>>>> Could you show me how to convert this command , using -rf
>> option
>> >>>>> (whatever the affinity is)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> mpirun -n 1 -host r001n001 master.x options1 : -n 1 -host
>> >>>>> r001n002
>> >>>>> master.x options2 : -n 1 -host r001n001 slave.x options3 : -n
>> 1 -
>> >>>>> host r001n002 slave.x options4
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks for your help
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Geoffroy
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Message: 2
>> >>>>> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:26:35 +0300
>> >>>>> From: Lenny Verkhovsky <lenny.verkhovsky_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>> >>>>> To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>>> Message-ID:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> <453d39990904120826t2e1d1d33l7bb1fe3de65b5361_at_[hidden]>
>> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The first "crash" is OK, since your rankfile has ranks 0 and 1
>> >>>>> defined,
>> >>>>> while n=1, which means only rank 0 is present and can be
>> >>>>> allocated.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> NP must be >= the largest rank in rankfile.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> What exactly are you trying to do ?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I tried to recreate your seqv but all I got was
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ~/work/svn/ompi/trunk/build_x86-64/install/bin/mpirun --
>> hostfile
>> >>>>> hostfile.0
>> >>>>> -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -rf rankfile.1 -n 1 hostname
>> >>>>> [witch19:30798] mca: base: component_find: paffinity
>> >>>>> "mca_paffinity_linux"
>> >>>>> uses an MCA interface that is not recognized (component MCA
>> >>>> v1.0.0 !=
>> >>>>> supported MCA v2.0.0) -- ignored
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> It looks like opal_init failed for some reason; your parallel
>> >>>>> process is
>> >>>>> likely to abort. There are many reasons that a parallel process
>> >>>>> can
>> >>>>> fail during opal_init; some of which are due to configuration
>> or
>> >>>>> environment problems. This failure appears to be an internal
>> >>>> failure;
>> >>>>> here's some additional information (which may only be relevant
>> >>>>> to an
>> >>>>> Open MPI developer):
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> opal_carto_base_select failed
>> >>>>> --> Returned value -13 instead of OPAL_SUCCESS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> [witch19:30798] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>> ../../orte/runtime/orte_init.c at line 78
>> >>>>> [witch19:30798] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>> ../../orte/orted/orted_main.c at line 344
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> A daemon (pid 11629) died unexpectedly with status 243 while
>> >>>>> attempting
>> >>>>> to launch so we are aborting.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>> >>>> above).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the
>> needed
>> >>>>> shared
>> >>>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>> >>>>> have the
>> >>>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this
>> will
>> >>>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>> >>>> process
>> >>>>> that caused that situation.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Lenny.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 4/10/09, Geoffroy Pignot <geopignot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi ,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I am currently testing the process affinity capabilities of
>> >>>>> openmpi and I
>> >>>>>> would like to know if the rankfile behaviour I will describe
>> >>>>>> below
>> >>>>> is normal
>> >>>>>> or not ?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> cat hostfile.0
>> >>>>>> r011n002 slots=4
>> >>>>>> r011n003 slots=4
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> cat rankfile.0
>> >>>>>> rank 0=r011n002 slot=0
>> >>>>>> rank 1=r011n003 slot=1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ##################################################################################
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 2 hostname
>> ### OK
>> >>>>>> r011n002
>> >>>>>> r011n003
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ##################################################################################
>> >>>>>> but
>> >>>>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -
>> n 1
>> >>>>> hostname
>> >>>>>> ### CRASHED
>> >>>>>> *
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankfile.0)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> rmaps_rank_file.c at line 404
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 87
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 77
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter
>> in
>> >>>> file
>> >>>>>> plm_rsh_module.c at line 985
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1 while
>> >>>>> attempting to
>> >>>>>> launch so we are aborting.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>> >>>>> above).
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the
>> needed
>> >>>>> shared
>> >>>>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>> >>>>> have the
>> >>>>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this
>> >>>>>> will
>> >>>>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> orterun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to
>> the
>> >>>>> process
>> >>>>>> that caused that situation.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> orterun: clean termination accomplished
>> >>>>>> *
>> >>>>>> It seems that the rankfile option is not propagted to the
>> second
>> >>>>> command
>> >>>>>> line ; there is no global understanding of the ranking
>> inside a
>> >>>>> mpirun
>> >>>>>> command.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> ##################################################################################
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Assuming that , I tried to provide a rankfile to each command
>> >>>> line:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> cat rankfile.0
>> >>>>>> rank 0=r011n002 slot=0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> cat rankfile.1
>> >>>>>> rank 0=r011n003 slot=1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -
>> rf
>> >>>>> rankfile.1
>> >>>>>> -n 1 hostname ### CRASHED
>> >>>>>> *[r011n002:28778] *** Process received signal ***
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] Failing at address: 0x34
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 0] [0xffffe600]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 1]
>> >>>>>> /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/libopen-rte.so.
>> >>>>> 0(orte_odls_base_default_get_add_procs_data+0x55d)
>> >>>>>> [0x5557decd]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 2]
>> >>>>>> /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/libopen-rte.so.
>> >>>>> 0(orte_plm_base_launch_apps+0x117)
>> >>>>>> [0x555842a7]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 3] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/openmpi/
>> >>>>> mca_plm_rsh.so
>> >>>>>> [0x556098c0]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 4] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun
>> >>>>> [0x804aa27]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 5] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun
>> >>>>> [0x804a022]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 6] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)
>> >>>>> [0x9f1dec]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 7] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun
>> >>>>> [0x8049f71]
>> >>>>>> [r011n002:28778] *** End of error message ***
>> >>>>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)*
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I hope that I've found a bug because it would be very
>> important
>> >>>>> for me to
>> >>>>>> have this kind of capabiliy .
>> >>>>>> Launch a multiexe mpirun command line and be able to bind my
>> exes
>> >>>>> and
>> >>>>>> sockets together.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance for your help
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Geoffroy
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> users mailing list
>> >>>>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -------------- next part --------------
>> >>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> users mailing list
>> >>>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>>>
>> >>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1202, Issue 2
>> >>>> **************************************
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> users mailing list
>> >>>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> users mailing list
>> >>>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>>> -------------- next part --------------
>> >>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> users mailing list
>> >>>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>>>
>> >>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1218, Issue 2
>> >>>> **************************************
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> users mailing list
>> >>>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>>
>> >>> -------------- next part --------------
>> >>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> users mailing list
>> >>> users_at_[hidden]
>> >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>>
>> >>> End of users Digest, Vol 1221, Issue 3
>> >>> **************************************
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> users mailing list
>> >> users_at_[hidden]
>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >>
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > users mailing list
>> > users_at_[hidden]
>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> >
>> > End of users Digest, Vol 1221, Issue 6
>> > **************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users




  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s