Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] MPI_Bcast from OpenMPI
From: shan axida (axida2009_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-23 08:24:14


Sorry, I had a mistake in calculation. Not 131072 (double) but 131072 KB. It means around 128 MB. ________________________________ From: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:23:52 PM Subject: Re: [OMPI users] MPI_Bcast from OpenMPI Very strange; 6 seconds for a 1MB broadcast over 64 processes is *way* too long. Even 2.5 sec at 2MB seems too long -- what is your network speed? I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "4 link" on your graph. Without more information, I would first check your hardware setup to see if there's some kind of network buffering / congestion issue occurring. Here's a total guess: your ethernet switch(es) are low quality (from an HPC perspective, at least) such that you're incurring congestion and/or retransmission at that size for some reason. You could also be running up against memory bus congestion (I assume you mean 4 cores per node; are they NUMA or UMA?). But that wouldn't account for the huge spike at 1MB. On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:32 AM, shan axida wrote: > Hi, > One more question: > I have executed the MPI_Bcast() in 64 processes in 16 nodes Ethernet multiple links cluster. > The result is shown in the file attached on this E-mail. > What is going on at 131072 double message size? > I have executed it many times but the result is still the same. > > THANK YOU! > > > > > > > > <openmpi.pdf>_______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users_at_[hidden] > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users --Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems _______________________________________________ users mailing list users_at_[hidden] http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users