Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Deadlock on large numbers of processors
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-12 13:41:49

Justin --

Could you actually give your code a whirl with 1.3rc3 to ensure that
it fixes the problem for you?

On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Tim Mattox wrote:

> Hi Justin,
> I applied the fixes for this particular deadlock to the 1.3 code base
> late last week, see ticket #1725:
> This should fix the described problem, but I personally have not
> tested
> to see if the deadlock in question is now gone. Everyone should give
> thanks to George for his efforts in tracking down the problem
> and finding a solution.
> -- Tim Mattox, the v1.3 gatekeeper
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Justin <luitjens_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Hi, has this deadlock been fixed in the 1.3 source yet?
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> On Dec 11, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Justin wrote:
>>>> The more I look at this bug the more I'm convinced it is with
>>>> openMPI and
>>>> not our code. Here is why: Our code generates a communication/
>>>> execution
>>>> schedule. At each timestep this schedule is executed and all
>>>> communication
>>>> and execution is performed. Our problem is AMR which means the
>>>> communication schedule may change from time to time. In this
>>>> case the
>>>> schedule has not changed in many timesteps meaning the same
>>>> communication
>>>> schedule is being used as the last X (x being around 20 in this
>>>> case)
>>>> timesteps.
>>>> Our code does have a very large communication problem. I have
>>>> been able
>>>> to reduce the hang down to 16 processors and it seems to me the
>>>> hang occurs
>>>> when he have lots of work per processor. Meaning if I add more
>>>> processors
>>>> it may not hang but reducing processors makes it more likely to
>>>> hang.
>>>> What is the status on the fix for this particular freelist
>>>> deadlock?
>>> George is actively working on it because it is the "last" issue
>>> blocking
>>> us from releasing v1.3. I fear that if he doesn't get it fixed by
>>> tonight,
>>> we'll have to push v1.3 to next year (see
>>> and
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users_at_[hidden]
> --
> Tim Mattox, Ph.D. -
> tmattox_at_[hidden] || timattox_at_[hidden]
> I'm a bright...
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]

Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems