Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Ray Muno wrote:
>> OK, that tells me lots of things ;-)
>> Should I be running configure with --with-wrapper-cflags,
>> --with-wrapper-fflags etc,
>> set to include
> If you want to, sure. As a guideline, the wrapper compilers put in the
> minimum number of flags to get the job done -- any other flags are a
> local policy decision (and we wouldn't presume to make those for you).
> FWIW, the warning is harmless, but I can see how you wouldn't want users
> to see it / be alarmed by it.
If we have them compile with -i_dynamic, are there any implications?