Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.2.4 verbosity w.r.t. osc pt2pt
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-13 20:10:17

On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:01 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:

> But it is easy for OPen MPI to figure out whether it's statically or
> dynamically linked, as libtool compiles the code twice if building
> both
> static and shared and you could poke at #defines to figure out what's
> going on -- easy enough to deal with. I just don't think we should be
> doing so :).

I agree.

But FWIW: how do you do this in the "--enable-static --enable-shared"
case? I couldn't think of how to do a different #define for two
different compiles of the same source file without significant hackery.

Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems