On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 15:28 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:33 +0100, Åke Sandgren wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 21:27 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> > >
> > > Run an nm on opal/mca/memory/ptmalloc2/.libs/malloc.o and check if
> > > malloc is defined in there.
> > >
> > > This seems to be the problem i have when compiling with pathscale.
> > > It removes the malloc (public_mALLOc) function from the objectfile but
> > > leaves the free (public_fREe) in there, resulting in malloc/free
> > > mismatch.
> > For pathscale the solution for me was to add -fno-builtin.
> > Now ompi_info doesn't segfault anymore.
> > Check if the intel 10 has something similar.
> Below is the nm output. The no builtin compiler option you mentioned above seems to belong to gcc. I have compiled openmpi-1.2.4 with the gcc-4.1.2 suite without problems.
Ok, it was a long short anyway.
Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
Internet: ake_at_[hidden] Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90 7866126
Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se