On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Biagio Cosenza wrote:
> > Jeff, I did what you suggested
> > However no noticeable changes seem to happen. Same peaks and same
> > latency times.
> Ok. This suggests that Nagle may not be the issue here.
My guess would be that there are some nasty dead animals burried in the
network. The op mentioned 200 ms, that's enough time to cross continents, not
a time you'd expect in the same sentence as "cluster" and "latency".
...on the other hand we don't really know what the benchmark case was.