This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
The kind of recovery I am seeking after is easy, and the following
simple example illustrates the point:
I want to send a message to a different node. If it does not respond to
me, I do not want my application to crash. I want to continue using
other node resources.
I hate it when a node crashes that all my MPI_WORLD goes now. Is there
a way around that?
I could give up the other extra hairy stuff, but it would be difficult
to lose my running job whenever a node or application goes down.
> Send users mailing list submissions to
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. threading (Sam Adams)
> 2. Re: users Digest, Vol 536, Issue 1 (Mohammad Huwaidi)
> 3. Fault Tolerance (Mohammad Huwaidi)
> 4. Re: Fault Tolerance (Thomas Spraggins)
> 5. Re: Fault Tolerance (George Bosilca)
> 6. MPI processes swapping out (Heywood, Todd)
> 7. deadlock on barrier (tim gunter)
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:29:34 -0500
> From: "Sam Adams" <smadasam_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: [OMPI users] threading
> To: users_at_[hidden]
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> I have been looking, but I haven't really found a good answer about
> system level threading. We are about to get a new cluster of
> dual-processor quad-core nodes or 8 cores per node. Traditionally I
> would just tell MPI to launch two processes per dual processor single
> core node, but with eight cores on a node, having 8 processes seems
> My question is this: does OpenMPI sense that there are multiple cores
> on a node and use something like pthreads instead of creating new
> processes automatically when I request 8 processes for a node, or
> should I run a single process per node and use OpenMP or pthreads
> explicitly to get better performance on a per node basis?
We can't resolve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used
when we created them.