On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Axel Schweiger wrote:
> I'm afraid, I'm not familiar enough to dive into it. I suspect
> between the fact we have a working MPI
> implementation (MPICH) and the fact the this version of the pop
> model is superceded, it is probably
> not worth the effort to spend a lot of time on it.
> I was hoping that this was maybe a "typical" error that could be
> treated with different compiler switches
> or that it mapped to a known bug/incompatability in OpenMPI.
> If this isn't the case it probably is best to drop it?
I'm sorry that I don't have the cycles to dive into this. I'm
*guessing* that it's an application problem, but without actually
looking into it, it's impossible to know.
Server Virtualization Business Unit