Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-22 16:38:06

On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Axel Schweiger wrote:

> I'm afraid, I'm not familiar enough to dive into it. I suspect
> between the fact we have a working MPI
> implementation (MPICH) and the fact the this version of the pop
> model is superceded, it is probably
> not worth the effort to spend a lot of time on it.
> I was hoping that this was maybe a "typical" error that could be
> treated with different compiler switches
> or that it mapped to a known bug/incompatability in OpenMPI.

Sorry. :-(

> If this isn't the case it probably is best to drop it?

I'm sorry that I don't have the cycles to dive into this. I'm
*guessing* that it's an application problem, but without actually
looking into it, it's impossible to know.

Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems