Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Greg Lindahl (greg.lindahl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-01 14:13:13

On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:51:24AM +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:

> This might be a bit naive but, if you spawn two procs on a dual core dual
> socket system then the linux kernel should automagically schedule them this
> way.

No, we checked this for OpenMP and MPI, and in both cases wiring the
processes to cores was significantly better. The Linux scheduler
(still) tends to migrate processes to the wrong core when OS threads
and processes wake up and go back to sleep.

Just like the OpenMPI guys, we don't have a clever solution for the
"what if the user wants to have 2 OpenMP or MPI jobs share the same
node?" Well, I have a plan, but it's annoying to implement.

-- greg