Okay - sorry it didn't work, but thought it worth a shot. Let us know what
On 10/26/06 3:44 PM, "Daniel Vollmer" <maven_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 26.10.2006, at 23:12, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>> If you wouldn't mind, could you try it again after applying the
>> patch? This looks like a problem we encountered on another release
>> something in the runtime didn't get initialized early enough. It
>> only shows
>> up in certain circumstances, but this seems to fix it.
> Thank you for the quick reply, but the patch did not help matters.
> I'm currently in the process of compiling a current gcc as I am not
> sure how far Apple's rather old gcc 4.01 derivative can be trusted.
> users mailing list