Quoting "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]>:
> If you are looking for the path of least resistance, then going back to
> MPICH is probably your best bet (there is certainly merit in "it ain't
> broke, so don't fix it").
>
True - but where is your sense of adventure!!
> However, there may be a few other factors to consider:
>
> - Just because an app runs and completes with one MPI implementation
> does not mean that the application is correct; running with a different
> implementation can be a great way to find bugs that you were unaware of
>
This is precisely the situation I found since at three places in the code I had
...
call MPI_TYPE_COMMIT(side,ierr)
...
call MPI_TYPE_FREE(side)
...
Neither MPICH nor OpenMPI object on compilation but, as I mentioned MPICH
runs but OpenMPI needs the correct syntax
...
call MPI_TYPE_FREE(side,ierr)
...
to run correctly.
Thanks for email.
Richard Wait
Uppsala University
Department of Information Technology
Scientific Computing
Box 337
75105 UPPSALA
Tel: 018-4712757
Fax: 018-523049
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}