Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

From: Ralph Castain (rhc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-28 11:27:49


There has been some discussion on this list about connecting multiple applications so that their processes can inter-communicate and/or inter-operate. I thought it might be of help if I briefly described the mechanisms within Open MPI for doing this - in doing so, I will not limit myself to the MPI interface, but will discuss the more general capabilities of the Open MPI/OpenRTE system.

Note: I apologize if I confuse people by using "OpenRTE" explicitly here. However, the OpenRTE layer underneath Open MPI is where this functionality is actually implemented, and - in one option below - it provides some functionality that lies outside the MPI standard but might be of interest to the community.

Let me start by describing the design for Open MPI/OpenRTE, and then I'll briefly explain what part of that is in the current release.

Design
There are three ways for interconnecting applications with Open MPI/OpenRTE:

1. Dynamic process spawning using the MPI "comm_spawn" methodology. Open MPI includes support for dynamic process spawning as defined in the MPI standard. For the purposes of this discussion, note that this requires the application developer to incorporate the path name of the application to be spawned into the source code. Thus, connecting to another application - or another (differently named) version of the application - requires a change to the source code.

2. Run-time connection using the "connect" command-line option. The benefit of this approach is that you don't have to directly code the applications that are being connected - i.e., you don't have to put anything in your source code that stipulates the precise application to which you want to be connected. Instead, this option simply connects all the processes from one instance of "mpirun" to another. Of course, your code still has to know what to do with the communication channel.

As a (probably bizarre) example, consider the case where I have built a model that uses a utility code to generate some information (e.g., a mesh). The utility code does this whenever my model transmits a set of parameters to all the processes in the utility code, and the utility code communicates its output back via an MPI transmission. Using this option for connecting applications, I can experiment with different versions of my utility code by simply: (a) executing my model via an mpirun command, and then (b) executing a version of the utility with another mpirun, and connecting it to the model via the "connect' option. No change to source code (e.g., to embed the name of the alternative version) is required, nor do I have to recompile the model - everything is handled at run-time.

3. Direct synchronization using the OpenRTE General Purpose Registry (GPR). The prior two options only provide a means for exchanging communication connection information between processes of different applications. There are times, though, when multi-application integration requires more - for example, two applications might need to synchronize their computations so that one knows when the other has completed its work. One such case could be in climate models, where an atmospheric propagation model might want to "pause" until a sea-ice model has completed the latest epoch calculation, and then use the output of that model as input to its own computation of the next epoch.

This could be accomplished via option 1 (dynamic spawning), coupled with the transmission of messages to coordinate action. However, we have built another option into the system that makes this a little more transparent and (perhaps) easier to accomplish. In addition, it automatically supports asynchronous operations so that applications can use event-driven logic to guide their operations.

This mode requires that the developer(s) of the applications do a little planning as they must agree on the definition of registry locations for synchronizing information (for more on the registry's data representation scheme, see the OpenRTE design document at http://www.open-rte.org/documentation/design.php). With that done, each application would "subscribe" to the location where other applications will be writing synchronizing flags. In the case of the climate model, for example, the sea-ice model could write the time stamp for the completed epoch in a location. The climate model would subscribe to that location and request notification whenever the value in that location is changed - the model might also stipulate that another registry location containing the name of the sea-ice model's output file for that epoch be returned to it whenever the subscription fires.

Clearly, given the exchange of communication ports in options 1 or 2, an application developer could implement this degree of synchronization themselves. The advantage of this approach, however, is that it relieves the application programmer from having to implement such protocols themselves in every application - the complexities of identifying trigger events, notifying other applications, etc. is all handled for them "under the covers".

My guess is that we'll find more ways to take advantage of this capability as people begin to experiment with it.

Current Release
The current release supports options 1 and 3 at this time, although the interface for option 3 has not yet been exposed through the MPI layer. Users desiring to use and/or experiment with direct synchronization will need to configure Open MPI with the "--with-devel-headers" option so that the OpenRTE include files will be copied to the install directory tree. Once this has been done, you will have full access to the GPR's API, which is described in the gpr.h header. Further documentation on option 3 will be released in upcoming weeks.


I hope that helps answer some of your questions - and also that it stimulates some thought on how you might explore these capabilities as they are released!
Ralph