Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Edgar Gabriel (gabriel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-02 12:09:24


as far as I know, Open MPI should follow the machinefile for spawn
operations, starting however for every spawn at the beginning of the
machinefile again. An info object such as 'lam_sched_round_robin' is
currently not available/implemented. Let me look into this...

Jean Latour wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Testing the MPI_Comm_Spawn function of Open MPI version 1.0.1, I have an
> example that works OK,
> except that it shows that the spawned processes do not follow the
> "machinefile" setting of processors.
> In this example a master process spawns first 2 processes, then
> disconnects from them and spawn 2 more
> processes. Running on a Quad Opteron node, all processes are running on
> the same node, although the
> machinefile specifies that the slaves should run on different nodes.
>
> With the actual version of OpenMPI is it possible to direct the spawned
> processes on
> a specific node ? (the node distribution could be given in the
> "machinefile" file, as with LAM MPI)
>
> The code (Fortran 90) of this example and makefile is attached as a tar
> file.
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Jean Latour
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users