On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Benjamin Allan wrote:
> It would be nice if the c++ compiler wrapper were
> installed under mpicxx, mpiCC, and mpic++ instead of
> just the latter 2.
Yeah, we can do that, no problem. It won't be in the soon-to-ship
beta, but will be in the 1.0 and the SVN trunk.
> Also on the fantasy wish list is for the libraries to
> be installed in libtool form (unless you go away from autotools
Do you mean install the .la files as well as the usual .so and .a
files? If so, we already do that. If you mean something else, could
you explain what you mean?