Chris Samuel wrote:
> ----- "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>> What do people think?
>>
>
> Looks very interesting, but the licensing might cause
> some headaches as CeCILL-B seems to be like the old
> BSD license with advertising clause, which is held to
> be incompatible with the GPL. :-(
>
I will raise the issue to our local legal people. They pushed for
CeCILL-B as most French research institutes do (CeCILL* licenses have
been designed to be totally ok wrt the French legislation). But if BSD-3
helps here, we will look at relicensing.
So, the actual problem would be that OMPI could not be
combined/distributed together with another GPL project if OMPI shipped
its own included libtopology? Out of curiosity, who's
combining/distributing OMPI like this?
thanks,
Brice
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}