On Jul 24, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
> > We agree. :-) I'm just saying that PLPA should be able to report
> these two
> > different pieces of information to a caller.
> Yes we agree :) And yes, it would be nice to have PLPA report the
> list of
> allowed and bound cpus. But since getting the list of allowed cpus
> would
> require a dependency on cpusets or cgroups, I think this is a lot of
> work
> and maintenance for little gain.
>
Hmm. Now I'm confused. I thought you said that we could read /dev/
cpuset ourselves without too much trouble...?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
|