PLPA Users' Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-05 10:23:18

• Next message: Srinivas G.: "Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• Previous message: Srinivas G.: "[PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• In reply to: Srinivas G.: "[PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• Next in thread: Srinivas G.: "Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• Reply: Srinivas G.: "Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"

On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Srinivas G. wrote:

> Please let me know whether the plpa_sched_getaffinity and
> plpa_sched_setaffinity are equivalent to the Windows
> GetProcessAffinityMask and SetThreadAffinityMask /
> SetProcessAffinityMask API.

I'm afraid I don't know...

Are there any Windows programmers here on the list?

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems

• Next message: Srinivas G.: "Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• Previous message: Srinivas G.: "[PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• In reply to: Srinivas G.: "[PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• Next in thread: Srinivas G.: "Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"
• Reply: Srinivas G.: "Re: [PLPA users] sched_getaffinity and sched_setaffinity"