PLPA Users' Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [PLPA users] [PATCH] finish s/max_*_num/max_*_id/g
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-21 15:13:24

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [PLPA users] [PATCH] use max_core_id[socket] as tighter bound for valid core id"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [PLPA users] [PATCH] fix mem leak in load_cache.c"
• In reply to: Bert Wesarg: "[PLPA users] [PATCH] finish s/max_*_num/max_*_id/g"

Committed in r170; thanks.

On Mar 21, 2008, at 7:35 AM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> max_processor_num wasn't renamed in plpa_map, but in plpa.h.in. So
> do it now.
>
> Bert
>
> ---
> <rename-
> max_processor_num
> .patch>_______________________________________________
> plpa-users mailing list
> plpa-users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/plpa-users

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [PLPA users] [PATCH] use max_core_id[socket] as tighter bound for valid core id"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [PLPA users] [PATCH] fix mem leak in load_cache.c"
• In reply to: Bert Wesarg: "[PLPA users] [PATCH] finish s/max_*_num/max_*_id/g"