Hmm. So I'm confused -- I thought you said in #9 that "There should
be just 2 physical sockets on the mainboard". So PLPA is now
reporting 2 sockets, numbered correctly.
I do have PLPA intentionally skipping reporting sockets that have no
cores on them. Are you saying that plpa-info should report sockets
with no cores? I chose not to do that because how would you know
what they are? Linux only reports the sockets that are in use -- how
would you know what sockets are not in use? For example, what if you
populate a motherboard with 4 sockets in sockets 0 and 1 -- how would
PLPA know that sockets 2 and 3 exist?
On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:01 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> I think that I fixed ticket #9; the problem of some systems that did
>> not have consecutive processor, socket, or core ID's.
>>
>> I have released 1.1a2 with the fixes for this problem:
>>
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/plpa/download.php
>>
>> Please give it a spin.
>>
>
> It is better now but still wrong. It should say # of socket = 4
> and socket 0: 1 core, socket 1,2:0 cores and socket 3: 1 core.
> (SMT is off).
>
> [ollie_at_exponential plpa-info]$ ./plpa-info --topo
> Kernel affinity support: yes
> Kernel topology support: yes
> Number of processor sockets: 3
> Socket 0: 1 core
> Socket 2: 0 cores
> Socket 3: 1 core
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> plpa-users mailing list
> plpa-users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/plpa-users
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}