Open MPI logo

PLPA Users' Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all PLPA Users mailing list

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-24 10:23:03


On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Bert Wesarg wrote:

> Finaly a found a machine with HTT enabled (btw: what is 'HMT'?)

"HMT" = Jeff is having a bad morning; he can't type, read error
messages, and should strongly consider having significant amounts of
caffeine before replying any further.

> but without the node directory
>
> this reminds we, that we need some sort of smart fallback, if some
> directories or files are missing

Agreed.

Right now, if the (socket,core) stuff is unavailable, you'll get a
graceful failure from all the topology functions.

Is it possible to have less than all of the (socket,core)
information, the node ID information, and HTT information? Do we
need to make the have_topo_information() function a bit more fine-
grained? (i.e., indicate which, if any, of the topology information
is available) And/or make *some* of the functions fail (gracefully)
if the requested information is unavailable?

I do not follow the history of the Linux kernel enough to know when
this stuff was introduced, nor what distros are doing to back port, etc.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems