On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Hmm. Is there anything we can do about this? Should we just
> document this behavior?
The only way that I can see is to get rid of the _set to validate the
length. This eliminates both the possibility of getting the wrong
value after a change by an external entity and the possibility of
asking for an inactive/inexistent CPU that would return -EINVAL.
--
Bogdan Costescu
IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen
Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY
Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868
E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu_at_[hidden]
|