Open MPI logo

MTT Devel Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all MTT Devel mailing list

From: Josh Hursey (jjhursey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-29 07:22:02


yeah I think we should be ok for now leving the trial results in the
db. Let's revisit this in the future if things start to slow down again.

-- Josh

On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> Let's see how the speed goes as we keep accumulating trials. If it
> becomes a problem, we can re-examine pruning. But unless it becomes
> a problem, let's just keep the philosophy of "keep everything".
>
> Disk space is cheap. Hopefully, dbv3 will let us store arbitrary
> amounts of data with no loss in performance. :-) :-) :-)
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
>
>> Are we not going to prune "trial" results in the new schema?
>> We previously pruned trial results to improve query speed,
>> but for small date range intervals this might not be
>> worthwhile with the new schema. Also, I assume a "trial" MPI
>> install could key to a "non-trial" test build, which would
>> mean we can only prune out test runs if we decide to prune
>> at all.
>>
>> -Ethan
>> _______________________________________________
>> mtt-devel mailing list
>> mtt-devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> mtt-devel mailing list
> mtt-devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel