Open MPI logo

MTT Devel Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all MTT Devel mailing list

From: Josh Hursey (jjhursey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 16:06:39


Yeah I just ran IU's nightly set against my DB and it went fine
submitting 6024 test_run results.
I say we are good to go forward.

Here are some performance numbers:
Summary Report (24 hours all orgs)
[ 107,070 test_runs]
v2 - 87 sec
v3 - 6 sec
Summary Report (24 hours Only 'iu')
[ 29,625 test_runs]
v2 - 37 sec
v3 - 4 sec

Summary Report (Past 3 days all orgs)
[ 294,395 test_runs]
v2 - 138 sec
v3 - 9 sec

Summary Report (Past 3 days Only 'iu')
[ 86,026 test_runs]
v2 - 49 sec
v3 - 11 sec

Summary Report (Past 2 weeks all orgs)
[ 1,460,824 test_runs]
v2 - 863 sec
v3 - 34 sec
Summary Report (Past 2 weeks Only 'iu')
[ 346,804 test_runs]
v2 - 878 sec (not seeded)
v2 - 2 sec (pre-seeded)
v3 - 12 sec

Summary Report (Past 1 month all orgs)
[2,981,678 test_runs]
v2 - 1395 sec
v3 - 158 sec
Summary Report (Past 1 month Only 'iu')
[ test_runs]
v2 - 1069 sec (not seeded)
v2 - 2 sec (pre-seeded)
v3 - 39 sec

Summary Report (2007-06-18 - 2007-06-19 all orgs)
[ 43,816 test_runs]
v2 - 484 sec
v3 - 5 sec
Summary Report (2007-06-18 - 2007-06-19 only 'iu')
[ 30,059 test_runs]
v2 - 479 sec (not seeded)
v2 - 2 sec (pre-seeded)
v3 - 2 sec

Some stats I collected that we need not distribute, but thought were
interesting:
Some intersting stats to date (2007-08-20)
# test_run results : 17,522,720
# test_build results : 42,655
# mpi_install results : 45,096
# of performance results : 58,365

Most popular test suites:
   intel : 65.5 %
   ibm : 28.0 %
   onesided : 4.3 %
   trivial : 1.5 %
   imb : 0.4 %

Most popular compilers:
   gnu : 49.8 %
   intel : 30.8 %
   sun : 6.9 %
   pathscale : 6.8 %
   pgi : 5.7 %

OS testing percentages:
   Linux: 93.2 %
   SunoS: 6.8 %

Org. Contribution percentages:
   Cisco : 66.4 %
   IU : 23.2 %
   Sun : 6.8 %
   IBM : 2.3 %
   HLRS : 1.3 %
   Voltaire : 0.0 %
   UTK : 0.0 %

On Aug 23, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> I think we got good submits to the josh db last night -- I think my
> prior problems were pilot error (accidentally sharing scratch
> directories between my josh-db testing MTT runs and my production MTT
> runs).
>
> http://osl.iu.edu/~jjhursey/research/mtt/server/php/reporter.php?
> do_redir=6
>
> So I think Cisco is happy with the new DB and good for the Monday
> rollout plan.
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> mtt-devel mailing list
> mtt-devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel