On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I think I am going to agree. Three comments:
> * which "binding fails" do you refer to? I assume all cases I listed.
Yes.
> * I was initially against changing the default behavior of hwloc-bind,
> but it's not like changing the ABI. There are likely very few scripts
> using hwloc-bind out there. Breaking some of them is not too bad as long
> as we give a useful error message.
Agreed.
> * If we start failing because of invalid inputs in hwloc-bind, we may
> have to do the same in hwloc-calc. The parsing code is shared anyway.
I think the philosophy should apply to all executables, actually.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|