Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Users' Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] Solaris and hwloc
From: Samuel Thibault (samuel.thibault_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-12 18:48:57

Jeff Squyres, le Thu 13 Sep 2012 00:46:33 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> Anyone have an opinion? I'm 60/40 in favor of not letting it run, under the rationale that the user asked for something that we can't deliver, so we shouldn't continue.
> >
> > Well, it depends on the situation. The binding might only be an
> > optimization, and failing just because of that is not nice. When it's an
> > administration decision, it's different, but then one would use cgroups
> > & such instead.
> How about adding a flag to make it fail if it doesn't bind?

Now I understand Brice's --strict flag mentioning :)