Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Users' Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Users mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] Problems on SMP with 48 cores
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-13 11:08:42


Here's more information: see attached for hwloc debug output (and the
straight output as well) for 'lstopo --of console'.

HTH
Regards Hartmut
---------------
http://boost-spirit.com
http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Squyres [mailto:jsquyres_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:15 AM
> To: hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]; Hardware locality user list
> Cc: 'Samuel Thibault'
> Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] Problems on SMP with 48 cores
>
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:51 AM, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
>
> > But the problems I was seeing were not MSVC specific. It's a
> > proliferation of arcane (non-POSIX) function use (like strcasecmp,
> > etc.) missing use of HAVE_UNISTD_H, HAVE_STRINGS_H to wrap
> > non-standard headers, unsafe mixing of
> > int32<->int64 data types, reliance on int (and other types) having a
> > certain bit-size, totally unsafe shift operations, wide use of
> > (non-C-standard) gcc extensions, etc. Should I go on?
>
>
> Can you send patches?
>
> FWIW, hwloc is working for me with a wide array of POSIX-ish compilers on
> POSIX-ish platforms (albeit perhaps many of them are quite similar -- 64
> bit systems on more-or-less modern-ish hardware). There's quite a degree
> of portability built in, but if we missed some stuff, well, we're not
> perfect. :-)
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/