so, set_membind() merged with HWLOC_MEMBIND_BIND is useless?
The behaviour I want to set is it possible?
2011/9/25 Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden]>
> Le 25/09/2011 20:57, Gabriele Fatigati a écrit :
> > after done this, memory is allocated not in a local node of thread
> > that does set_membind and malloc, but in node of thread that touches
> > it. And I don't understand this behaviour :(
> Memory is allocated when first-touched. If there's no area-specific
> policy, it's allocated according to the policy of the thread that
> touches, not according to the policy of the one that did malloc. If you
> want to follow the malloc'er thread, you have to touch right after malloc.
> hwloc-users mailing list
Ing. Gabriele Fatigati
SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department
Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy
www.cineca.it Tel: +39 051 6171722
g.fatigati [AT] cineca.it