Hardware Locality Users' Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc-ps output - how to verify process binding on the core level?
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-14 20:22:31

• Next message: Samuel Thibault: "Re: [hwloc-users] [hwloc-announce] Hardware Locality (hwloc) v1.1.2rc1 released"
• Previous message: Siew Yin Chan: "Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc-ps output - how to verify process binding on the core level?"
• In reply to: Siew Yin Chan: "Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc-ps output - how to verify process binding on the core level?"

On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Siew Yin Chan wrote:

> Thank you very much for your input which makes my direction pretty clear now. Depending on the progress of my project, I may be adventurous to try the nightly tarball, or may wait until a stable version is released.

FWIW, we release 1.5.2rc1 today. It contains the hwloc stuff.

> I appreciate the hard work of the OMPI team, and am look forward to a more flexible binding option in OMPI's future release.

Thanks! We're shooting for 1.5.3, but it might slip to 1.5.4.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

• Next message: Samuel Thibault: "Re: [hwloc-users] [hwloc-announce] Hardware Locality (hwloc) v1.1.2rc1 released"
• Previous message: Siew Yin Chan: "Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc-ps output - how to verify process binding on the core level?"
• In reply to: Siew Yin Chan: "Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc-ps output - how to verify process binding on the core level?"