Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] Relationship between Cario and X11
From: Brice Goglin (Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-01 13:09:27

Le 01/11/2013 16:01, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> Ah; I missed that because we have the X11 checking stuff done in hwloc.m4 already -- I thought the ones in the Cairo were actually redundant.
> It looks like this logic isn't quite correct, anyway -- the X11 checks are embedded in the Cairo and GL sections. Should they moved out to be independent of Cairo and GL (and therefore only once, and include the AC_DEFINE for HWLOC_HAVE_X11)?

Autoconf should be able to cache the result of duplicate checks. So
unless it really hurts, I don't care much.

I do care however about the GL code being annoying to test. So please
don't make me test multiple patchs :)

Also, is libnvctrl available on Mac? Do you have a NVIDIA GPU to test
the GL backend?