Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl
From: Brice Goglin (Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-08 02:26:43


Le 08/05/2013 02:47, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> How's this patch?
>
> The only question I have is: how do we figure out what libraries to put in the .pc file in the --disable-shared --enable-static case?

There should be a ltdl.pc for this. But I don't see any. Is there a
standard way to extract this line from ltdl.la ?
dependency_libs=' -ldl'

How about we do not support plugins when --enable-static is given?

Brice

>
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Wed 08 May 2013 02:21:02 +0200, a écrit :
>>> On May 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't have anything against this. What was the reason for not using
>>>> the default/system libltdl in OMPI? libtool was buggy when you started
>>>> using it?
>>>
>>> I neglected to answer this.
>>>
>>> Yes, plus libltdl grew new functionality that we needed (global/local symbol visibility).
>>>
>>> We might be getting to the point soon where we can rely on the installed libltdl to be new enough everywhere, but we haven't had that conversation.
>> We could already check that the installed version is new enough for our
>> needs.
>>
>> Samuel
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-devel mailing list
>> hwloc-devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel