On 26/04/2012 08:11, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> On 26/04/12 02:35, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> I think I would vote for lstopo (no X/cairo) and lstopo<suffix> so
>> that completion helps.
> Not sure if that's an option with Debian given the policy; the hwloc
> package would have to have lstopo with X enabled and then a nox
> package would install that variant of lstopo and use the alternatives
> system to select which to use.
lshw and lshw-gtk are co-installable on Debian and you get two different
binaries without an alternative config. But that doesn't mean it's OK
wrt the Debian policy :)