On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> But it still seems overkill to me to use approach 1 while approach 2
> just works. Yes, that conflicts with the original issue of the thread.
> It happens that on Debian we can actually make hwloc and hwloc-nox
> co-installable, by just putting a diversion: the hwloc /usr/bin/lstopo
> would take over the hwloc-nox /usr/bin/lstopo. Same command name, and
> installation flexibility.
> Of course, my finding the whole thing overkill doesn't mean that I'm
> against it being done. I'm just giving my point of view.
Also, I fully recognize that I'm mainly a helper here -- you guys are definitely the main maintainers of hwloc. So if my proposal is not preferred, I'll shut up about it. :-)
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/