Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] lstopo-nox strikes back
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-25 10:55:02


On Apr 25, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:

>> FWIW: Having lstopo plugins for output would obviate the need for having two executable names.
>
> Well, it seems overkill to me. It makes sense to me to have both
> xlstopo and lstopo.

Ick. FWIW, I dislike having two executables. I like having one executable that can adapt itself to whatever is loaded / available on the system. :-)

But if I'm in the minority, no problem...

If I'm not, I can work on a patch to see if it would be horribly disruptive...

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/