Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] lstopo-nox strikes back From: Samuel Thibault (samuel.thibault_at_[hidden]) Date: 2012-04-25 10:48:00
Jeffrey Squyres, le Wed 25 Apr 2012 15:45:18 +0200, a écrit : > FWIW: Having lstopo plugins for output would obviate the need for having two executable names.
Well, it seems overkill to me. It makes sense to me to have both xlstopo and lstopo.
Samuel
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}