Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: BGQ empty topology with MPI
From: Daniel Ibanez (dan.a.ibanez_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-22 18:07:11


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Daniel Ibanez <dan.a.ibanez_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault_at_[hidden]>

I suspected this might be the reason, so I called "nm"
with the static versions of the libraries their compiler wrappers
link against and I could not find the term "hwloc" in the output.
Is this a valid test?

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> Brice Goglin, le Thu 22 Mar 2012 10:58:46 +0100, a écrit :
> > I don't see anything bad in your outputs.
> > So there's something strange going on when MPI is added. Which MPI are
> using?
> > Is this a derivative of MPICH that embeds hwloc? (MPICH >= 1.2.1 if I
> remember
> > correctly)
>
> There might be symbol conflicts then, indeed. That's the usual problem
> with embedding instead of using an installed library. Doesn't its
> configure use the installed library if one exists?
>
> Samuel
>

-- 
Dan Ibanez
-- 
Dan Ibanez