This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> That looks good to me, as long as starting port numbers to 1 for
> non-IB/OFED is OK.
Hmm. Not sure about that. I always thought it was strange that IB devices started with port 1.
Are *we* (hwloc) supplying the port number, or are you getting it from /sys somewhere?
(/me reads the patch and ibdev2netdev...)
Ah, I see -- we're effectively doing the same thing as the ibdev2netdev script:
port=$(printf "%d" $port)
port=$(( port + 1 ))
Hrm. I don't know if the +1 is a good assumption to make in general.
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/