Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:41:47 +0100, a écrit :
> On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
> >>Option #4:
> >> CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077'
> >>Appears to work for me for xlc-8.0 and xlc-9.0.
> >That still looks dangerous to me: we don't know whatever warning
> >might be added in the future. I'd rather add -qhalt=e only for the
> >sched_setaffinity test.
> I don't recommend adding -qsuppress automatically, just documenting it for
> users that need xlc-8 or xlc-9.
I'm not actually talking about the -qsuppress, but about still using
-qhalt=e, which might make a lot more other warnings fatal.