Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] Memory affinity
From: Samuel Thibault (samuel.thibault_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-28 15:22:24

Jeff Squyres, le Mon 28 Feb 2011 21:18:52 +0100, a écrit :
> On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> That would seem to imply that I should always hwloc_set_area_membind() if I want it to persist beyond any potential future swapping.
> >
> > I guess that could be right, but it definitely deserves testing before
> > trusting potentially-outdated documentation :)
> Brice - did you see anything about this when reading the kernel code?
> > I don't remember such kind of document details for other OSes, in any case.
> Are you saying that other OS's don't promise anything about whether memory binding / policy is remembered for swapped-out pages?

I've not seen such promises in the documentation, at least (I however
have to say that I hadn't looked for it specifically either).