Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-05 09:02:25

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [hwloc-devel] questions about memory binding flags"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [hwloc-devel] questions about memory binding flags"
• In reply to: Samuel Thibault: "Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?"
• Next in thread: Jiri Hladky: "Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?"
• Reply: Jiri Hladky: "Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?"

On Jan 4, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:

>> I got a crash course on s390.
>
> (Not sure about the english meaning here: it does not mean hwloc
> crashed, right?)

Correct. It means a fast learning process.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [hwloc-devel] questions about memory binding flags"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: [hwloc-devel] questions about memory binding flags"
• In reply to: Samuel Thibault: "Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?"
• Next in thread: Jiri Hladky: "Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?"
• Reply: Jiri Hladky: "Re: [hwloc-devel] Is hwloc supposed to work on s390 and s390x architecture?"