Le 21/12/2010 09:37, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Brice Goglin, le Tue 21 Dec 2010 08:36:28 +0100, a écrit :
>> Le 21/12/2010 00:37, Jiri Hladky a écrit :
>>> Regarding the naming. I would argue that since the utility is
>>> currently called
>>> then the man page should be named
>>> What's your opinion?
>> Fine with me. I wasn't sure because you originally named your file
>> without .sh.
> Couldn't we just drop the .sh suffix from the command itself?
I'll do that in trunk and keep the filename unchanged in 1.1