Jeff Squyres, le Wed 08 Dec 2010 16:49:46 +0100, a écrit :
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Le 08/12/2010 10:41, Nathalie Furmento a écrit :
> >> I would rather go for a solution like this:
> >> Node L#1 (P#0)
> >> Socket L#1
> >> PU L#2 (P#3)
> >> to be more homegeneous.
> > Thanks, I think I like it. I'll commit something like that unless
> > somebody complains by tomorrow.
> Looks good.