Looks good.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 08/12/2010 10:41, Nathalie Furmento a écrit :
>> I would rather go for a solution like this:
>>
>> Node L#1 (P#0)
>> Socket L#1
>> PU L#2 (P#3)
>>
>> to be more homegeneous.
>
> Thanks, I think I like it. I'll commit something like that unless
> somebody complains by tomorrow.
>
> Brice
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}