Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] SWIG bindings
From: Brice Goglin (Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-03 15:51:26


Le 03/12/2010 21:42, Bernd Kallies a écrit :
>> We should really encourage people to use XML in such cases. Setting
>> HWLOC_XMLFILE=/path/to/exported/file.xml in the environment should just
>> work (as long as you update the XML file major hwloc releases or os).
>> Maybe we should add a dedicated section about this in the documentation?
>> Something like "Speeding up hwloc on large nodes"? And maybe even
>> encourage distro-packager to create a XML export file under /var/lib
>> with an advice to add HWLOC_XMLFILE to /etc/environment if they care
>> about hwloc/HPC?
>>
>> Anyway Bernd, can you export a XML on this nice machine and reload it
>> and see how long it takes? I hope all the bottlenecks are in the Linux
>> backend parsing /sys and /proc, not in the actual hwloc core.
>>
> I'm not sure if I understood. From my point of view it makes no sense to
> create an XML representation of the topology with hwloc, and then read
> this XML in again to be able to dive into it to figure out something.
> When there is an API that provides direct access to parts of the
> topology once it is constructed, then the XML thing is useless
> additional work.
>

Don't see the XML as a way to represent the topology and traverse it.
Just see it as a cache that you can read much faster than /proc and
/sys. Once you load the XML, you get the usual hwloc API.

> But this would not help us in many
> of our use cases. We have to analyze topologies that do not represent a
> whole machine. We analyze topologies that are bound to cpusets. We do
> this e.g. to construct pinning schemes for MPI applications that run
> inside of batch jobs, which get their cpusets created on the fly
> depending on their resource requests and current load of the machine.
>

Right, if the cpuset changes, caching in XML is useless (except if we
implement a way to restrict a given topology in the future).

> The
> problem here is rather, if every task running on a node should read the
> topology and figure out on which CPU it should pin itself, or if one
> does this by one master task on a node, and communicate the result to
> the others. But this is outside of hwloc.
>

Well, having hundreds of processes read /proc and /sys at the same time
is also another reason to use XML. The master can read the topology once
and pass it to all other processes through XML-files or
XML-buffers-over-socket. I assume that's what Open MPI will do in the
near future.

Brice