Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc to be included in RHEL 6.1
From: Jirka Hladky (jhladky_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-22 13:28:37

On Monday, November 22, 2010 06:57:45 pm Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jirka Hladky, le Mon 22 Nov 2010 18:45:03 +0100, a écrit :
> > I would also like to ask you to consider adding the Title to the
> > graphical output so that users can distinguish easily if the graphics
> > was created with --physical or --logical numbering.
> >
> > Adding single line to the top of graphics which says:
> > "This graphics is using [physical|logical] numbering. See man hwloc for
> > details."
> >
> > would make it clear.
> Well, it's not so nice when using this in figures for presentations,
> papers, etc. Wouldn't
> PU L#0
> vs
> PU P#0
> be indicative enough?
> Samuel

Hi Samuel,

P and L is a nice idea. I'm just afraid that the new hwloc users will not
understand the difference.

What about adding the suggested legend:

 "This graphics is using [physical|logical] numbering. See man hwloc for

at the bottom of the graphics?