Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap
From: Brice Goglin (Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-22 10:46:58


Le 22/09/2010 16:30, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
> On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>> hwloc_set_*? hwloc_objset* ? Anything better?
>>
>> hwloc_set_* might not be the best since we would have a hwloc_set_set()
>> function to set one bit :)
>>
> Agreed. Too bad, though -- I liked hwloc_set*.
>
> hwloc_group* (that seems kinda lame, though)
> hwloc_stuff* (hah)
> hwloc_bitmap*
>
> ?
>

bitmap or bitmask would be acceptable to me.

>> By the way, hwloc_cpuset_cpu() and hwloc_cpuset_all_but_cpu() should be
>> renamed too. hwloc_set_onlyone() and hwloc_set_allbutone() maybe?
>>
> How about just hwloc_set() which takes a single position parameter? "onlyone" can be implied.
>

In case you missed it: cpu() = zero() + set() and all_but_cpu() = fill()
+ clr()
Maybe just drop these?

Brice