Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-22 10:30:30


On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:

> hwloc_set_*? hwloc_objset* ? Anything better?
>
> hwloc_set_* might not be the best since we would have a hwloc_set_set()
> function to set one bit :)

Agreed. Too bad, though -- I liked hwloc_set*.

hwloc_group* (that seems kinda lame, though)
hwloc_stuff* (hah)
hwloc_bitmap*

?

> By the way, hwloc_cpuset_cpu() and hwloc_cpuset_all_but_cpu() should be
> renamed too. hwloc_set_onlyone() and hwloc_set_allbutone() maybe?

How about just hwloc_set() which takes a single position parameter? "onlyone" can be implied.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/