Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc membind interface? [Was: svn:hwloc r2339]
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-19 09:20:50


Can't we have both?

Sent from my PDA. No type good.

On Aug 19, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Changing the title for more attention by programmers :)
>
> What people prefer to give as parameter for the membind interface? A
> set of nodes (from a combination of obj->nodeset, or built by hand using
> os_index of NODE objects), or a set of cpus (from obj->cpuset)?
>
> OS interfaces take a set of nodes, so that if we use a set of cpus,
> we'll have to convert to nodes anyway.
>
> Samuel
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel