Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc membind interface? [Was: svn:hwloc r2339]
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-19 09:20:50


Can't we have both?

Sent from my PDA. No type good.

On Aug 19, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Changing the title for more attention by programmers :)
>
> What people prefer to give as parameter for the membind interface? A
> set of nodes (from a combination of obj->nodeset, or built by hand using
> os_index of NODE objects), or a set of cpus (from obj->cpuset)?
>
> OS interfaces take a set of nodes, so that if we use a set of cpus,
> we'll have to convert to nodes anyway.
>
> Samuel
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel