Hmm; not quite. We need the AC_MSG_ERROR to be at the top level so that it doesn't force embedded usages to error our if hwloc can't be built (e.g., the top level may decide to proceed without hwloc). $2 and $3 are for success / failure.
On May 11, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pavan Balaji, le Mon 10 May 2010 20:56:19 -0500, a écrit :
> > I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers
> > that don't support C99, would you be willing to gracefully abort during
> > configure instead of failing at make time?
> Right, thanks.
> hwloc-devel mailing list
For corporate legal information go to: