Darn. The patch is incorrect. Sorry, too sleepy. It should be checking
for $ac_prog_cc_c99 instead. But you get the idea.
On 05/10/2010 08:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers
> that don't support C99, would you be willing to gracefully abort during
> configure instead of failing at make time?
> I agree that most compilers today probably support C99, but whether to
> drop C89-only support is a policy decision we are yet to make in MPICH2,
> and will need the above patch to get hwloc integrated cleanly in all our
> supported environments.
> -- Pavan